Abstract
Electrotherapy plays a significant role in rehabilitation and performance optimisation. Among the most effective modalities are Aussie Current (Medium Frequency Burst Modulated Current) and Microcurrent Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation (MENS). This article presents a comprehensive scientific review and treatment protocol applying these modalities across three clinical scenarios: a musculoskeletal injury in an athlete, chronic low back pain in a sedentary adult, and post-surgical muscle atrophy in an elderly patient. Backed by peer-reviewed studies, the article explores frequency parameters, clinical outcomes, and functional benefits of integrating Aussie and Microcurrent into holistic rehabilitation programmes.
1. Introduction to Electrotherapy in Rehabilitation
Electrotherapy is a cornerstone in modern physical rehabilitation, particularly due to its non-invasive nature and capacity to promote tissue regeneration, neuromuscular re-education, pain modulation, and performance enhancement.
The Aussie current is a medium-frequency alternating current, developed in Australia, characterised by short bursts (2–4 ms) modulated at lower frequencies (e.g., 10 Hz for pain relief, 50 Hz for strengthening). It provides deeper penetration and increased comfort compared to Russian current.
Microcurrent therapy (MENS), using currents in the microampere range (below sensory threshold), stimulates cellular metabolism and ATP production without inducing muscle contraction, aiding tissue healing.
“The therapeutic benefits of electrotherapy include increased circulation, cellular repair, and neuromuscular activation.” (Alon, G., 2001)
2. Mechanism and Applications of Aussie Current
Aussie current operates typically at 1,000 Hz or 4,000 Hz carrier frequency, with burst modulation. Studies show it is more comfortable than Russian current due to shorter burst durations, while maintaining efficacy.
“Burst-modulated medium-frequency current produces stronger and more tolerable contractions than traditional low-frequency stimulation.” (Ward, A. R., Shkuratova, N., 2002)
Clinical Effects:
- Enhanced muscle strength
- Neuromuscular re-education
- Improved range of motion
- Pain reduction
3. Mechanism and Applications of Microcurrent Therapy (MENS)
Microcurrent acts at the cellular level to restore electrical potential, increase ATP synthesis (up to 500% in some studies), and promote healing.
“Microcurrent therapy enhances ATP production, amino acid transport, and protein synthesis in healing tissues.” (Cheng, N. et al., 1982)
Clinical Effects:
- Accelerated tissue repair
- Pain reduction
- Reduction of inflammation
- Scar softening
4. Protocol 1: Elite Athlete with Hamstring Strain (Grade I–II)
Population: 28-year-old male footballer
Goals: Accelerate recovery, restore neuromuscular control, prevent reinjury
Phase 1 (Acute):
- Microcurrent (500 µA, 0.5 Hz, 30 min) daily
- Cryotherapy + Compression
- Gentle isometric contractions
Phase 2 (Subacute):
- Aussie current: 1,000 Hz carrier, 50 Hz burst, 4 s ON / 10 s OFF, 20 min
- Stretching and proprioceptive training
- Functional EMS: prone knee flexion
Phase 3 (Return to Play):
- Strength training with Aussie current superimposed
- Sport-specific drills
- Plyometrics and neuromuscular control
“Electrical stimulation accelerates return-to-play time in hamstring injuries when integrated with functional rehab.” (Worrell, T. W., 1994)
5. Protocol 2: Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain (Sedentary Adult)
Population: 45-year-old office worker, sedentary lifestyle
Goals: Reduce pain, improve posture, enhance core stability
Phase 1 (Pain Management):
- Aussie current: 1,000 Hz carrier, 10 Hz burst, 20 min (pain modulation)
- Microcurrent therapy to lumbar region (200 µA, 0.3 Hz, 30 min)
- Breathing and gentle pelvic tilt exercises
Phase 2 (Strengthening):
- Aussie current: 4,000 Hz, 50 Hz burst, abdominal and lumbar paraspinals
- Core stability training (planks, bird-dogs)
- Postural correction education
“Combined core stabilisation and electrical stimulation effectively reduce chronic low back pain.” (Koumantakis, G. A. et al., 2005)
Phase 3 (Maintenance):
- Activity integration (walking, low-impact cardio)
- Weekly microcurrent maintenance sessions
- Ergonomic adjustments at work
6. Protocol 3: Elderly Post-Knee Replacement with Atrophy
Population: 70-year-old female post total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
Goals: Improve quadriceps strength, reduce pain, promote safe mobility
Phase 1 (Early Rehab – Post-op Week 2):
- Microcurrent (400 µA, 0.5 Hz, 30 min) for pain and wound healing
- Passive ROM and assisted mobilisation
Phase 2 (Muscle Re-education):
- Aussie current: 1,000 Hz carrier, 35 Hz burst, 10 s ON / 20 s OFF, quadriceps
- Sit-to-stand training with stimulation
- Gait re-education with walker
Phase 3 (Functional Strengthening):
- Leg extensions with EMS
- Closed-chain exercises (mini squats, step-ups)
- Balance exercises and fall prevention
“Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves quadriceps strength and function after TKA.” (Stevens-Lapsley, J. E. et al., 2012)
7. Clinical Considerations and Safety
- Monitor skin integrity in elderly and sensitive skin
- Screen for contraindications (pacemaker, epilepsy, pregnancy, malignancy)
- Adjust intensity to patient tolerance
- Always combine electrotherapy with movement and functional integration
8. Conclusion
Aussie current and microcurrent therapy offer evidence-based, effective modalities for rehabilitation across diverse populations. When used with appropriate frequency, intensity, and integration into functional movement, they can significantly improve outcomes in both acute and chronic conditions. These protocols provide a foundation for safe and effective clinical practice.
References
- Alon, G. (2001). Principles of electrical stimulation. In Nelson & Currier’s Clinical Electrotherapy (4th ed.).
- Ward, A. R., Shkuratova, N. (2002). Russian electrical stimulation: The early experiments. Physical Therapy, 82(10), 1019-1030.
- Cheng, N., Van Hoof, H., Bockx, E. (1982). The effect of electric currents on ATP generation, protein synthesis, and membrane transport in rat skin. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (171), 264–272.
- Koumantakis, G. A., Watson, P. J., Oldham, J. A. (2005). Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise alone for chronic low back pain. Spine, 30(6), E245–E254.
- Worrell, T. W. (1994). Factors associated with hamstring injuries. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 16(1), 12–18.
- Stevens-Lapsley, J. E., Balter, J. E., Wolfe, P., Eckhoff, D. G., Kohrt, W. M. (2012). Quadriceps and hamstrings muscle dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470(1), 195–202.
- Oschman, J. L. (2000). Energy Medicine: The Scientific Basis. Churchill Livingstone.
- Vance, C. G., Rakel, B. A., Dailey, D. L., Sluka, K. A. (2015). Using TENS for pain control: The state of the evidence. Pain Management, 5(6), 457–467.
- Kots, Y. M. (1977). Electrostimulation of skeletal muscles: A review of Soviet research. U.S. Department of Defense Translation.
- Robertson, V. J., Ward, A. R., Low, J., Reed, A. (2006). Electrotherapy Explained: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Elsevier.
